MISAO Project

Japanese version       Home Page       Updated on March 14, 2007

    Revision of 14 MISAO New Variables    

March 14, 2007
Yoshida, S.

I am researching further observations of the MISAO Project new variable stars from the CCD images taken after their discovery.

Here I report the revision of 14 MISAO new variables.

* MisV0129   13.0-15.8C   M   P=310:   Epoch=2453290:

Based on the unfiltered CCD observations from 1999 to 2004 by Ken-ichi Kadota and Nobuo Ohkura, it was revealed to be a Mira variable with a large variation of 13.0 - 15.8 mag, and a period of about 310 days.

* MisV0197 = V720 Cep   10.1-15.8C   M   P=305:   Epoch=2452150:

Based on the unfiltered CCD observations from 1999 to 2004 by Ken-ichi Kadota and Nobuo Ohkura, it was revealed to be a Mira variable with a large variation of 10.1 - 15.8 mag, and a period of about 305 days.

* MisV0198 = V2464 Cyg   12.4-14.7C   M   P=185:   Epoch=2451860:

Based on the unfiltered CCD observations from 1999 to 2003 by Ken-ichi Kadota and Nobuo Ohkura, it was revealed to be a Mira variable with a large variation of 12.4 - 14.7 mag, and a period of about 185 days.

* MisV0368 = V2271 Cyg   12.1-13.0C   SR   P=100   Epoch=2451325

The NSVS data revealed that it is a semi regular variable with a range of 12.7 - 13.5 mag, and a period of 100 days. The unfiltered CCD observations from 1999 to 2000 by Ken-ichi Kadota and Nobuo Ohkura coincided to the magnitude range and the period.

However, it was observed as 15.4 mag, much fainter than the range, in the course of the unfiltered CCD observations by Nobuo Ohkura using a 300-mm camera lens in 2003 September. It is uncertain if the star really faded drastically, or that is an effect of came lens characteristics.

* MisV1210 = V968 Cas   12.9-13.7C   SR:

During the survey from Oct. 9 to Dec. 7 in 2003, it was almost constant at 13.3 mag until Nov. 4, but fading gradually down to 13.5 mag after that.

* MisV1211 = LX Cam   11.5-14.0C   M:

It brightened up to 11.5 mag in 2001 November, and faded down to 14.0 mag in 2003 November. The magnitude range was enlarged, and it was revealed to be a Mira variable, not a semi regular variable.

* MisV1212 = V682 Per   12.4-15.5C   M:

During the survey from Oct. 9 to Dec. 7 in 2003, it was brightening gradually from 15.5 mag to 14.2 mag.

* MisV1213 = V679 Per   10.9-14.2C   M:

It brightened up to 10.9 mag in 2003 October. The magnitude range was enlarged, and it was revealed to be a Mira variable, not a semi regular variable.

* MisV1214 = V684 Per   12.8-16.0C   M:

During the survey from Nov. 4 to Dec. 7 in 2003, it was brightening linearly from 16.0 mag to 13.6 mag, and the magnitude range was enlarged.

* MisV1246 = V448 And   10.4-12.8C   M:

During the survey from Oct. 25 to Dec. 3 in 2003 with an IR-cutting filter, it was fading linearly from 12.3 mag to 14.1 mag. The magnitude range was enlarged, and it was revealed to be a Mira variable, not a semi regular variable.

* MisV1263   13.0-15.9C   M:

It faded down to 15.9 mag in 2003 September. The magnitude range was enlarged, and it was revealed to be a Mira variable, not a semi regular variable.

* MisV1315   10.2-12.5C   M:

During the Rc-band survey from Nov. 19 to Dec. 14 in 2004, it was brightening linearly from 13.1 mag to 12.1 mag.

* MisV1319   11.3-13.2C   M   P=170   Epoch=2451480

During the survey from Oct. 21 to Nov. 25, it was fading linearly from 12.1 mag to 13.1 mag.

The NSVS data revealed that it is a Mira variable with a period of 170 days.

* MisV1325   13.5-14.3C   E?

It was fainter than 14.1 mag in March and December in 2000. But after that, it has been almost constant around 13.6 mag since 2001 until 2007. So it can be an eclipsing variable.

It cannot be a red variable based on the USNO-A2.0 color (B-R = 0.6 mag).

Reference:
[vsnet-chat 7335]

Copyright(C) MISAO Project (comet@aerith.net). All rights reserved.