Home Page Mon Dec 1 02:11:21 JST 1997
Next: Conclusion Up: Results of experiments Previous: Field flattening |
Linearity between magnitude and pixel valueThen I confirmed that stars of same brightness look same wherever they locate on the image. In addition, restoration of level correction in the method mentioned in this article causes not only dissolution of the difference depending on the position but also restoration of the linearity between magnitude and pixel value. I used the image of Nova Cas 1995 for this experiment. This is originally a printed picture and scanned.
Nova Cas 1995 Photo: Seiichi Yoshida Jan. 9, 1996, 19:01:30 JST (1 min) Fujishiro Town, Ibaraki Pref. Japan 25-cm f/6.3 Schmidt-Cassegrain Konica color GX3200 Let's pick up A C in circumference and D F in center. The table below shows the difference of pixel value amount of the detected stars in the old method described in [2] and in the new method mentioned in this article, and the true magnitude of the stars in the Tycho Catalog.
The mean magnitude of A C is 9.25 mag and D F is 10.83 mag. The ratio in brightness is 4.25 times. In the old method, the ratio of pixel value is only 2.1, probably because A C in circumference look fainter. In the new method, the ratio is 4.4 and very similar to the ratio of magnitude, which means the linearity is restored.
|