Weekly Information about Bright Comets (2006 Apr. 29: South)

Japanese version Home page	Updated on April 27, 2006
Last week North Next week

Best time and the azimuth, altitude (A,h) are at lat. 35 deg in the Southern Hemisphere.

73P-C/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 It is already very bright and visible visually with binoculars, 8.5 mag on Apr. 19 (John Bortle). Very strongly condensed. The stellar false nucleus and the broad tail are clearly visible visually. However, it has been reported significantly fainter than this ephemeris recently since early April. The brightness evolution became slower than expected. It will pass only 0.08 A.U. from the earth on May 12, remarkable approach after 76 years since its discovery in 1930. It was expected to be 4 mag at best, and to be visible with naked eyes. But actually, it will be much fainter. The condition keeps excellent until the encounter in mid May. Now totally three components, C, B and G, are visible bright. In addition, four other components, N, R, AP and AS, are observed 16-17 mag by CCD observations. Due to the approach of the comet, Bootids meteor shower observed in 1930 may appear in outburst again in May and June. But the earth will not pass through the dust trail in calculation. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 16 24.82 31 5.0 0.140 1.096 126 6.1 1:56 (180, 24) May 6 18 5.24 33 46.1 0.096 1.048 111 5.0 3:06 (180, 21) 73P-B/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 It had been brightening well as expected until late March. It was 11.9 mag on Mar. 31 (Seiichi Yoshida). However, an unexpected outburst happened on Apr. 2, and it reached to 9.2 mag (Apr. 7, Maciej Reszelski), almost as bright as the component C. The central condensation was extremely strong and the stellar false nucleus was clearly visible in early April. The outburst has already ended and now it looks diffuse cometary. But it keeps the brightness, still bright as 9.1 mag now (Apr. 17, Bjorn H. Granslo). Because the nucleus is still alive, it will be brightening again after this. It will reach to 5.5-6 mag at the remarkable approach in May as expected origianlly. In late April, the nucleus was split into two piecies, and in outburst. So the future brightness change is very remarkable. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 15 48.73 33 31.3 0.145 1.102 128 8.1 1:20 (180, 22) May 6 17 8.68 39 9.0 0.097 1.054 115 6.8 2:10 (180, 16) 73P-G/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 Although it was faint as 15.9 mag still on Apr. 2, it brightened rapidly since Apr. 5 and became bright and visible visually as 12.2 mag (Apr. 7, Andreas Kammerer). It is still bright as 11.7 mag on Apr. 17 (Seiichi Yoshida). Moderately condensed. If it keeps the current brightness, it will reach to 8 mag at the remarkable approach in May. However, this component was splitted into two piecies and looked double nuclei in late March. If the current brightness is a temporary outburst due to the nucleus split, it may fade out after this. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 15 42.40 33 52.8 0.146 1.104 128 10.3 1:14 (180, 21) May 6 16 57.98 39 55.4 0.097 1.056 116 9.2 1:59 (180, 15) C/2005 E2 ( McNaught ) It has been visible visually in the low sky since last August. It has been bright as 10 mag for three months since December. It will be too low to observe soon. It will appear in the morning sky again in late August at 13.5 mag. It will come to locate high in October, then it will be visible visually again at 14 mag. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 3 35.31 30 46.0 2.641 1.760 23 11.0 18:45 (119,-13) May 6 3 58.35 31 59.2 2.707 1.809 21 11.1 18:39 (120,-13) C/2006 A1 ( Pojmanski ) It reached to 5.2 mag at best in late February and early March. The fading had been slow in March, however, it turned to be fading rapidly in April. Now it is 10.2 mag (Apr. 21, Juan Jose Gonzalez). Although it had been moderated condensed until early April, now it is very diffuse. In the Northern Hemisphere, it keeps observable in good condition until it fades out. It will be fading gradually in the morning sky after this. It will be fainter than 13 mag in late May. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 0 29.79 62 3.0 1.825 1.441 51 11.1 5:09 (209,-23) May 6 0 53.81 63 38.0 1.966 1.551 51 11.7 5:13 (207,-23) C/2004 B1 ( LINEAR ) It had been originally expected to reach to 9 mag at best. But the brightness evolution has been very slow, and it is much fainter than expected actually. It was expected to be observable at 10 mag in the Southern Hemisphere in last autumn, however, it was only 12-13 mag actually. Then, it had been too low even in the Southern Hemisphere from January to February, and only few observations were reported. However, it is getting observable finally in the morning sky also in the Northern Hemisphere. It will be observable in good condition after this until autumn. Now it is 12.8 mag (Apr. 23, Juan Jose Gonzalez). It will be visible bright as 12 mag for a while. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 19 45.42 -1 20.3 1.481 1.927 99 11.7 5:09 (185, 56) May 6 19 28.52 3 53.3 1.411 1.979 108 11.7 4:35 (180, 51) 71P/Clark It was fainter than 13.0 mag and not visible visually on Mar. 31 (Seiichi Yoshida). But it was reported bright as 13.4 mag on Apr. 9, so it will become visible visually soon. It will reach to 12 mag in June. The condition is best beucase it is almost at opposition at the perihelion passage. However, it will be very low, only 13-20 deg high, from June to September in the Northern Hemisphere. When it gets higher again, it will be fainter than 14 mag, too faint to see visually. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 18 31.73 -24 53.6 0.834 1.607 121 12.8 4:05 (180, 80) May 6 18 44.84 -26 10.4 0.781 1.592 125 12.6 3:50 (180, 81) 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 (fainter fragments) In addition to the bright three components, C, B and G, about 40 faint components have been discovered. Now four other components, N, R, AP and AS, are observed bright as 16-17 mag by CCD observations. The other components are extremely faint. They are tiny fragments and the brightness change is very uncertain. Some of them are being splitted or already fading. But on the other hand, they may brighten rapidly, so observations are encouraged. Some of them will be visible visually at the remarkable approach in May. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 15 35.44 34 10.8 0.149 1.106 128 14.8 1:07 (180, 21) May 6 16 45.04 40 31.3 0.099 1.058 117 13.7 1:46 (180, 15) C/2003 WT42 ( LINEAR ) It brightened faster than a typical comet, and became visible visually as 13.5 mag in October (Oct. 24, Seiichi Yoshida). Now it is still bright as 13.6 mag (Apr. 17, Maciej Reszelski). Small and strongly condensed. Because it is distant from the sun, it keeps observable at 13.5 mag in good condition for a long time until 2006 June. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 9 42.98 48 4.7 5.061 5.193 91 13.7 19:14 (180, 7) May 6 9 45.96 47 9.5 5.149 5.195 86 13.8 18:50 (180, 8) 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1 It did not brighten so frequently in 2005. But it was often bright as 12-13 mag in early 2006. Now it is not observable. It will appear again at dawn in July. Then it will be observable in good condition in autumn and winter. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 2 52.28 24 49.4 6.784 5.804 12 13.9 18:45 (108,-18) May 6 2 58.33 25 12.7 6.800 5.806 8 13.9 18:39 (107,-21) 41P/Tuttle-Giacobini-Kresak Great outburst over 6 mag has occured always in recent appearances in 1995 and 2001. The ephemeris says it will be 14 mag at best, but the actual brightness evolution will not be along the prediction. It is expected to be visible visually due to an unpredicted outburst again in this return. It has been brightening well, already 14.5 mag on Apr. 20 (Mitsunori Tsumura), brighter than this ephemeris. It was too faint, fainter than 13.5 mag, to see visually on Apr. 17 (Piotr Guzik), but it will become visible visually soon. Although it will not approach to the earth so much in this return, it keeps observable all through the period in the evening sky until autumn. It becomes brightest in June and too faint in autumn. It keeps locating around 30 degree high after May. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 7 7.90 24 59.9 1.159 1.201 66 15.3 18:45 (149, 23) May 6 7 29.64 25 18.7 1.139 1.159 64 14.9 18:39 (150, 23) 102P/Shoemaker 1 Although it was not observed in its last return in 1999, it will be observable in good condition after the periheliion passage in this return. It will reach to 14.5 mag from June to August. It is not observable still now, but it will appear at dawn in May. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 23 58.44 0 27.4 2.686 2.001 38 15.2 5:09 (255, 19) May 6 0 11.34 2 56.3 2.632 1.992 41 15.1 5:13 (250, 22) 117P/Helin-Roman-Alu 1 In 2005 spring, it reached to 14 mag and became visible visually as 13.8 mag (July 8, Reinder J. Bouma). In 2006, it will be the same condition and brightness in summer again. Somewhat low in the south. But it will reach to 14 mag. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 22 5.37 -20 1.9 3.258 3.105 72 15.4 5:09 (256, 54) May 6 22 13.11 -19 39.2 3.175 3.112 77 15.4 5:13 (249, 58) 4P/Faye It was 16.6 mag on Apr. 21, brightening as expected. Although it is still low in the morning sky, it will be getting higher and brightening rapidly after this. It will be 14 mag and visible visually in June. It will reach to 8.5 mag from autumn to winter, and observable in its best condition. It keeps 14 mag still in 2007 April, so it keeps visible visually for a long time. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 22 35.05 -1 34.5 2.860 2.494 58 16.0 5:09 (241, 37) May 6 22 46.22 -0 24.3 2.747 2.452 62 15.7 5:13 (236, 39) 98P/Takamizawa It is unexpectedly bright as 15.5 mag on Apr. 2 (Ken-ichi Kadota). However, it keeps very low until June. It will be getting higher after it starts fading. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 22 24.40 -11 19.4 1.919 1.746 64 15.8 5:09 (249, 45) May 6 22 40.33 -10 28.1 1.886 1.768 67 15.8 5:13 (244, 48) C/2004 Q2 ( Machholz ) It was fantastic, so bright as 3.5 mag, so large as 30 arcmin, locating high overhead at its best time in early 2004 January. Then it has been getting fainter gradually, and become already too faint to see visually. However, it is still bright as 15.8 mag by CCD observations (Mar. 30, Katsumi Yoshimoto). It keeps observable until October when it becomes fainter than 18 mag. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 16 47.90 3 5.0 4.775 5.588 140 15.9 2:22 (180, 52) May 6 16 43.96 3 14.0 4.788 5.651 145 15.9 1:50 (180, 52) 174P/(60558) 2000 EC98 ( Echeclus ) It had been an extremely faint Centaur asteroid until 2004, fainter than 21 mag. However, it brightened up to 17.5 mag on 2005 Dec. 30, and a coma was observed, then it was revealed to be a comet. It brightened furthermore, 14.8 mag on Jan. 7 (Ken-ichi Kadota). It was also visible visually at 14.4 mag (Jan. 8, Seiichi Yoshida). It still keeps bright as 15.7 mag on Apr. 16 (Mitsunori Tsumura). Now the condensation of the outburst looks separatedly from the nucleus. Because it is a temporary brightening in outburst, it will return to be so faint as 21 mag in the near future. It will pass the perihelion in 2015. The heliocentric distance reduces down to 5.9 A.U., but it will be 17 mag at best. However, another outburst may happen again in the future. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 13 3.48 -4 38.2 11.921 12.860 157 16.2 22:34 (180, 60) May 6 13 2.03 -4 29.2 11.958 12.847 150 16.3 22:05 (180, 60) C/2004 D1 ( NEAT ) It brightened faster than a typical comet, and it reached to 15.8 mag on Feb. 9 (Ken-ichi Kadota). It will be observable in good condition as 16 mag for a long time until next spring. It was too faint to see visually, fainter than 13.9 mag (Mar. 31, Seiichi Yoshida). Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 10 19.33 61 36.2 4.904 5.010 90 16.3 19:50 (180, -7) May 6 10 22.29 60 30.2 4.978 5.017 86 16.3 19:26 (180, -5) C/2005 L3 ( McNaught ) It is outside of Jupiter's orbit, so it keeps observable for a long time. In 2006, it is still faint and locating somewhat low. But in 2007 and 2008, it is expected to be bright as 14.5-15 mag. It will locate high at that time, so it may be visible visually. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 20 28.39 -24 54.7 6.990 7.150 95 16.4 5:09 (232, 75) May 6 20 26.21 -24 49.6 6.837 7.121 102 16.3 5:13 (203, 79) C/2005 B1 ( Christensen ) It was 16.0 mag on Mar. 13 (Ken-ichi Kadota). It kept 16-16.5 mag for about one year from early 2005. It had been locating somewhat low for a while, but it will be higher after this. It keeps 17 mag until autumn when the condition becomes good. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 23 53.32 53 47.6 3.830 3.264 49 16.6 5:09 (213,-15) May 6 0 5.11 53 50.2 3.844 3.277 49 16.7 5:13 (211,-13) C/2005 K1 ( Skiff ) It had been observed at 16 mag by CCD, or 14 mag visually, in spring and summer in 2005. Now it is appearing again in the morning sky. It will be observable again at 16.5 mag in spring and summer in 2006. But the altitude will be somewhat lower than in 2005. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 19 47.64 -4 41.7 3.653 3.955 100 16.7 5:09 (186, 60) May 6 19 46.96 -5 32.5 3.565 3.977 106 16.7 4:53 (180, 61) P/2004 VR8 ( LONEOS ) Although it was faint as 18 mag at the discovery in 2004 November, then it brightened very rapidly until early 2005, and reached to 16.0 mag on May 7 (Ken-ichi Kadota). After it appeared in the morning sky again, it continued brightening furthermore, and reached to 14.7 mag on Nov. 22 (Ken-ichi Kadota). It was also visible visually as 14.4 mag (Mar. 29, Maciej Reszelski). However, it already faded down to 16.6 mag by CCD observations (Apr. 20, Mitsunori Tsumura). In the Northern Hemisphere, it keeps observable in good condition until summer when it becomes too faint. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 13 30.35 14 27.9 2.087 2.991 148 16.7 23:00 (180, 41) May 6 13 25.79 13 52.8 2.153 3.021 143 16.9 22:28 (180, 41) C/2002 VQ94 ( LINEAR ) It is outside of Jupiter's orbit. So it keeps 16.5-17 mag for a long time. Because it moves in the northern sky, it keeps locating high and observable in good condition until 2006 summer. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 14 6.17 68 51.4 6.625 6.817 96 16.7 23:35 (180,-14) May 6 13 55.94 68 12.3 6.662 6.821 94 16.7 22:58 (180,-13) C/2006 CK10 ( Catalina ) Although it is not observable around the perihelion passage, it is observable at 17 mag in good condition both in spring and autumn. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 6 57.89 53 38.8 2.125 1.942 65 17.0 18:45 (160, -3) May 6 6 48.69 50 54.4 2.234 1.905 58 17.0 18:39 (155, -3) C/2004 K1 ( Catalina ) It was visible visually as 14.3 mag in 2005 spring (July 10, Edwin van Dijk). Now it is 16.6 mag (Feb. 5, Ken-ichi Kadota). Although it had kept 16.5 mag since December until early April, it will fade out rapidly after this, and become fainter than 18 mag in July. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 11 4.66 20 15.9 3.757 4.349 119 17.1 20:35 (180, 35) May 6 10 56.79 20 8.3 3.910 4.387 111 17.2 20:00 (180, 35) (944) Hidalgo It reached to 13 mag and was observed visually in good condition in 2004 autumn. It has been not observable since August, but it is appearing at dawn again. It keeps 17 mag until late April. But it will go away soon after that. Next return is in 2018, when it will be 14.3 mag at best. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 12 37.92 5 55.6 3.461 4.338 146 17.2 22:08 (180, 49) May 6 12 33.46 5 37.2 3.563 4.379 139 17.4 21:36 (180, 49) P/2005 XA54 ( LONEOS-Hill ) It was so faint as 18.5 mag at the discovery in early December, but it brightened up to 17 mag in mid January. Then it started brightening extremely rapidly after mid January. It was visible visually as bright as 14.0 mag in late February (Feb. 27, Seiichi Yoshida). Very strongly condensed and almost stellar. Now it seems to be fading rapidly. But actually, it is still bright as 16.4 mag on Apr. 20 (Mitsunori Tsumura), brighter than this ephemeris. It may keep brighter for a while. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 11 3.46 25 48.3 1.180 1.865 116 17.4 20:35 (180, 29) May 6 11 13.44 25 3.5 1.254 1.889 112 17.7 20:17 (180, 30) 99P/Kowal 1 It was reported as 17 mag recently, a bit brighter than this ephemeris. It is also observable at the same brightness in 2007 spring, but the altitude will be a bit lower. Date(TT) R.A. (2000) Decl. Delta r Elong. m1 Best Time(A, h) Apr. 29 11 5.55 8 55.6 4.164 4.819 125 17.5 20:36 (180, 46) May 6 11 5.03 8 51.6 4.248 4.814 118 17.5 20:08 (180, 46)