Weekly Information about Bright Comets (2006 Feb. 11: North)

Japanese version
Home page
Updated on February 17, 2006
Last week South Next week

Best time and the azimuth, altitude (A,h) are at lat. 35 deg in the Northern Hemisphere.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

* C/2006 A1 ( Pojmanski )

New comet discovered by the southern survey ASAS. It was 10.5 mag on Jan. 6 (John Drummond), but it brightened rapidly and reached to 6.5 mag now (Feb. 4, Jim Gifford). Very strongly condensed, and rather small considering its brightness, with a diameter of only around 4 arcmin. It will pass only 0.6 A.U. from the sun in late February. It will reach to 5 mag at maximum, brighter than the original prediction by 2 mag. In the Southern Hemisphere, it keeps observable until early March. But it will be very low, around 15 degree high, after late January. In the Northern Hemisphere, it will become observable in late February at 5.5 mag, and keeps observable in the morning sky while fading gradually. It will be visible visually until May.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  20 15.93  -44 35.4   1.039   0.612    35    6.0   5:25 (312,-19)  
Feb. 18  20 11.25  -34 10.1   0.913   0.564    34    5.4   5:18 (306, -9)  

* C/2005 E2 ( McNaught )

It has been visible visually in the southern low sky since last August. Now it is brightest, 10.3 mag on Jan. 30 (Juan Jose Gonzalez). It was very small and sharp before, however, now it looks like a typical diffuse comet. It keeps 10 mag until March. In the Southern Hemisphere, it is not observable until autumn. In the Northern Hemisphere, the altitude is getting lower slowly, and it will be too low to observe in April.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  23 36.18    3 48.1   2.238   1.530    34   10.0  19:03 ( 83, 16)  
Feb. 18  23 55.66    6 47.2   2.249   1.522    33   10.0  19:09 ( 88, 15)  

* C/2004 B1 ( LINEAR )

It was expected to reach to 9 mag in 2006 spring. But actually, it is much fainer than expected, 13.9 mag on Aug. 1 and 11.7 mag still on Oct. 27 (Michael Mattiazzo). It seems to be a comet with very slow brightness evolution. It will be 11 mag at best. It is not observable until late March in the Northern Hemisphere, but will be observable for a long time while it is getting fainter after that. It will be too low even in the Southern Hemisphere from January to February. It was reported as 13.3 mag on Dec. 9 (Andrew Pearce). So maybe it is fading unexpectedly?

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  20 30.30  -37  9.5   2.412   1.602    27   11.4   5:25 (304,-17)  
Feb. 18  20 31.66  -34 38.8   2.370   1.608    31   11.3   5:18 (304,-13)  

* 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3

Recovered on Oct. 22 as 19.3 mag (C. W. Hergenrother). It will pass only 0.08 A.U. from the earth on May 12, remarkable approach after 76 years since its discovery in 1930. It was expected be so bright as 2 mag, but actually, it was fainter than its last appearance by 1.5 mag. Anyway, it will be 3.5 mag at best, and will be visible with naked eyes. It is already visible visually, 14.0 mag on Feb. 4 (Juan Jose Gonzalez). It keeps observable in good condition all through the encounter in May, while it will be brightening rapidly. The component B is fainter than this by 3 mag. The component E has not been recovered yet, which may have already disappeared because it faded before the perihelion passage in its last appearance in 2001. Due to the approach of the comet, Bootids meteor shower observed in 1930 may appear in outburst again in 2005 May and June. But the earth will not pass through the dust trail in calculation.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  13 33.48   11  5.0   1.051   1.787   122   13.6   4:10 (  0, 66)  
Feb. 18  13 42.94   11 38.3   0.937   1.721   126   13.1   3:52 (  0, 67)  

* C/2003 WT42 ( LINEAR )

It brightened faster than a typical comet, and became visible visually as 13.5 mag in October (Oct. 24, Seiichi Yoshida). Now it is 13.2 mag (Jan. 24, A. Baransky). Small and strongly condensed. Because it is distant from the sun, it keeps observable at 13.5 mag in good condition for a long time until 2006 June.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11   9 57.75   53 14.7   4.409   5.210   140   13.5   0:36 (180, 72)  
Feb. 18   9 53.85   53 20.7   4.425   5.206   138   13.5   0:04 (180, 72)  

* 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1

It had been so faint as around 15 mag for a long time since May. It had been too faint to see visually. However, an outburst occured on Sept. 9 and it brightened to 13 mag (Stephane Garro). Another outburst occured on Nov. 2, and it reached to 12.5 mag (Piotr Guzik). After that, it keeps somewhat faint around 14-15 mag. It was not visible visually on Jan. 18, fainter than 14.0 mag (Vitali Nevski). But another new outburst happened on Jan. 20. Now it is strongly condensed at 14.3 mag by CCD (Jan. 25, Toni Scarmato), and looks diffuse and bright as 13.6 mag visually (Jan. 26, Vitali Nevski).

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11   1 56.09   21 32.2   6.003   5.787    72   13.6  19:03 ( 78, 54)  
Feb. 18   1 59.83   21 41.6   6.109   5.789    66   13.6  19:09 ( 84, 48)  

* (60558) 2000 EC98

It had been an extremely faint Centaur asteroid until 2004, fainter than 21 mag. However, it brightened up to 17.5 mag on 2005 Dec. 30, and a coma was observed, then it was revealed to be a comet. It brightened furthermore, 14.8 mag on Jan. 7 (Ken-ichi Kadota). It is also visible visually at 14.4 mag (Jan. 8, Seiichi Yoshida). A strange spiral structure was captured like a planetary nebula. Looks diffuse visually. It seems to be a temporary brightening in outburst. Future brightness change is uncertain. It will pass the perihelion in 2015. The heliocentric distance reduces down to 5.9 A.U., and it will become brighter than now by 4 mag in calculation. However, the observations in its last return in 1980 were found and probably it was a faint asteroidal object at that time. Therefore, it will be back to the original brightness before 2015, and it will reach to 17 mag at best. It has been getting fainter very slightly, but it is still bright as 14.3 mag on Feb. 4 (Juan Jose Gonzalez), still visible visually.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  13 18.38   -6 19.6  12.453  12.996   121   14.3   3:55 (  0, 49)  
Feb. 18  13 17.70   -6 14.1  12.342  12.984   128   14.3   3:27 (  0, 49)  

* 73P-B/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3

One of the split components born in outburst in 1995. Recovered on Jan. 6 as 19 mag. It kept the same brightness as in its previous appearance in 2001. It brightened up to 17.8 mag on Jan. 23 (Ken-ichi Kadota). Then it unexpectedly brightened rapidly in early February, and reached to 16.0 mag on Feb. 7 (Rolando Ligustri), brighter than the original prediction by 1.0 mag. It will pass only 0.067 A.U. from the earth on May 14, remarkable approach after 76 years since its discovery in 1930. It is fainter than the main component by 2 mag, but will be closer to the earth than the main component. It will reach to 5 mag, and double naked eye comets will be visible. However, the current unexpected rapid brightening may be a sign to diminish in this return. It keeps observable in good condition all through the encounter in May.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  13 30.56   11 27.7   1.054   1.796   123   15.7   4:07 (  0, 66)  
Feb. 18  13 39.56   12  4.1   0.941   1.731   127   15.2   3:49 (  0, 67)  

* C/2003 K4 ( LINEAR )

Although it has already passed the perihelion in 2004 October, the fading after the perihelion passage is slow. It was visible visually still on Oct. 24 at 13.1 mag (Seiichi Yoshida). It is still bright, 14.6 mag on Dec. 31 (Ken-ichi Kadota). Because it is distant from the sun, it can be visible visually as 14 mag for a while after this.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11   2 25.54   -7 16.3   6.192   5.941    70   15.3  19:03 ( 41, 39)  
Feb. 18   2 26.11   -6 39.7   6.363   6.005    64   15.4  19:09 ( 49, 35)  

* C/2004 Q2 ( Machholz )

It was fantastic, so bright as 3.5 mag, so large as 30 arcmin, locating high overhead at its best time in early 2004 January. Then it had been getting fainter and smaller gradually, 12.5 mag on Sept. 3 (Edwin van Dijk) and 13.8 mag on Oct. 19 (Mitsunori Tsumura). It is appearing again in the morning sky. It was 15 mag on Dec. 27, as bright as expected (Syuji Kashiwagi). It was not visible visually, fainter than 13.9 mag (Jan. 8, Seiichi Yoshida).

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  16 54.54    0 10.1   5.093   4.870    71   15.4   5:25 (313, 44)  
Feb. 18  16 57.10    0 21.8   5.058   4.936    77   15.5   5:18 (318, 47)  

* C/2005 B1 ( Christensen )

It will pass the perihelion soon, in 2006 February. But it did not brightened so much as expected, 15.7 mag on Dec. 18 (Ken-ichi Kadota). It keeps observable at 15-16 mag for a long time from 2005 spring to the end of 2006. Because it moves in the northern sky, it keeps observable for a long time in the Northern Hemisphere. It is brightest until May, but keeps lower than 30 deg high.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  20 38.61   53 58.7   3.420   3.207    69   15.5   5:25 (222, 29)  
Feb. 18  21  1.29   54  2.0   3.456   3.205    67   15.5   5:18 (222, 29)  

* P/2004 VR8 ( LONEOS )

Although it was faint as 18 mag at the discovery in 2004 November, then it brightened very rapidly until early 2005, and reached to 16.0 mag on May 7 (Ken-ichi Kadota). After it appeared in the morning sky again, it continued brightening furthermore, and reached to 14.7 mag on Nov. 22 (Ken-ichi Kadota). It is also visible visually as 14.8 mag (Jan. 8, Seiichi Yoshida). After this, it keeps bright as 15 mag for a long time until spring. In the Northern Hemisphere, it keeps observable in good condition until summer when it becomes too faint.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  14  6.69   12 35.1   2.121   2.688   114   15.6   4:43 (  0, 68)  
Feb. 18  14  8.36   12 57.1   2.072   2.713   120   15.6   4:18 (  0, 68)  

* 71P/Clark

It has been brightening as 18.2 mag on Dec. 24 (Ken-ichi Kadota), 16.8 mag on Jan. 28 (Katsumi Yoshimoto). But it is a bit fainter than originally predicted by 0.7 mag. It is getting brighter rapidly in the morning sky. It will become visible visually at 13 mag in April, and will reach to 12 mag in June. The condition is best beucase it is almost at opposition at the perihelion passage. However, it will be very low, only 13-20 deg high, from June to September in the Northern Hemisphere. When it gets higher again, it will be fainter than 14 mag, too faint to see visually.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  15 46.96  -14  0.7   1.725   1.902    84   16.0   5:25 (342, 39)  
Feb. 18  16  1.91  -15  1.3   1.625   1.867    87   15.7   5:18 (344, 38)  

* C/2004 D1 ( NEAT )

It brightened faster than a typical comet, and it reached to 16.1 mag on Dec. 13 (Ken-ichi Kadota). It will be observable in good condition as 16 mag for a long time until next spring.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  10 48.80   66 41.3   4.328   4.975   126   15.9   1:26 (180, 58)  
Feb. 18  10 43.75   66 59.4   4.349   4.975   124   15.9   0:54 (180, 58)  

* 32P/Comas Sola

It has already gone far away, and it must have been around 19 mag in calculation. Actually, it was so faint as 18.3 mag on Jan. 8 (Ken-ichi Kadota). However, an unexpected outburst happened and it brightened up to 15.7 mag on Jan. 27 (Ken-ichi Kadota). Very strongly condensed. But t may be already fading rapidly.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  15  3.95   -9 24.4   2.980   3.232    95   16.0   5:25 (354, 45)  
Feb. 18  15  6.15   -9 32.2   2.917   3.271   102   16.2   5:15 (  0, 45)  

* P/2005 XA54 ( LONEOS-Hill )

It will be observable in good condition in February and March. It brightened up to 16.5 mag on Jan. 7 (Tsutomu Seki). Very small and strongly condensed. Because it is brightening rapidly, it will reach to 16 mag. But it will fade out rapidly after that.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  10 13.86   12 16.4   0.817   1.798   170   16.4   0:51 (  0, 67)  
Feb. 18  10 15.06   14 46.5   0.801   1.788   176   16.4   0:25 (  0, 70)  

* C/2004 K1 ( Catalina )

It was visible visually as 14.3 mag in 2005 spring (July 10, Edwin van Dijk). Although it has been not observable for a while, now it is appearing in the morning sky again. Now it is 16.7 mag (Dec. 18, Ken-ichi Kadota). Ken-ichi Kadota reported that a faint anti-tail is visible. It will be observable in good condition again in 2006 spring, but only 16 mag at best. Then it will fade out rapidly, and become fainter than 18 mag in July.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  13 20.28   12 10.9   3.300   3.960   125   16.4   3:58 (  0, 67)  
Feb. 18  13  9.67   13 22.2   3.232   3.992   134   16.4   3:20 (  0, 68)  

* C/2005 N1 ( Juels-Holvorcem )

It reached to 11.4 mag in August (Aug. 12, Juan Jose Gonzalez). It was expected to start fading since early September. But actually, it keeps bright as 11.8 mag still on Oct. 7 (Juan Jose Gonzalez). Because it had been very low in the morning, it was not observed visually after that. Now it faded down to 16.6 mag (Jan. 28, Katsumi Yoshimoto).

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  13 19.23   -8 33.3   2.091   2.729   120   16.4   3:56 (  0, 46)  
Feb. 18  13 11.68   -9 20.3   2.078   2.807   129   16.5   3:21 (  0, 46)  

* 101P/Chernykh

It was observed as 17.0 mag on July 10. Then it brightened as expected and reached to 15.0 mag on Oct. 1 (Mitsunori Tsumura). It was also visible visually as 13.5 mag Oct. 24 (Seiichi Yoshida). The second component was found at 18 mag on Nov. 30 about 20 arcmin from the main component. The main component also started fading, and it is 16 mag now.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11   1 48.95    6 20.5   2.618   2.386    65   16.6  19:03 ( 61, 44)  
Feb. 18   2  0.73    7 36.0   2.702   2.397    61   16.7  19:09 ( 68, 40)  

* C/2002 VQ94 ( LINEAR )

It passes the perihelion in 2006 February. But it is outside of Jupiter's orbit. So it keeps 17 mag for a long time. Because it moves in the northern sky, it keeps locating high and observable in good condition until 2006 summer.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  15 34.03   67  6.5   6.500   6.797   103   16.7   5:25 (188, 57)  
Feb. 18  15 32.24   67 38.4   6.490   6.797   103   16.6   5:18 (184, 57)  

* 60P/Tsuchinshan 2

It was observed around 20 mag in early October, as bright as expected. Then it brightened rapidly and reached to 16.9 mag on Jan. 4 (S. Pastor, J. A. Reyes). It will be observable in good condition at around 17 mag from December to March.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  11 12.73   -5 54.1   0.904   1.822   149   16.8   1:50 (  0, 49)  
Feb. 18  11  9.42   -6 22.4   0.893   1.839   155   16.9   1:19 (  0, 49)  

* (944) Hidalgo

It reached to 13 mag and was observed visually in good condition in 2004 autumn. It has been not observable since August, but it is appearing at dawn again. It keeps 17 mag until late April. But it will go away soon after that. Next return is in 2018, when it will be 14.3 mag at best.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  13 36.99    6  6.7   3.280   3.878   120   17.1   4:14 (  0, 61)  
Feb. 18  13 34.01    6  8.1   3.232   3.920   128   17.0   3:44 (  0, 61)  

* C/2005 EL173 ( LONEOS )

It will reach to 15.5 mag from late 2006 to early 2007 although locating rather low. It is observable around 17 mag from this winter to spring. It was observed as around 17.5 mag in early January.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11   9 42.28   -8 53.7   4.178   5.100   156   17.2   0:20 (  0, 46)  
Feb. 18   9 32.54   -8 48.5   4.134   5.063   157   17.1  23:38 (  0, 46)  

* P/2005 YQ127 ( LINEAR )

New comet. It must have been visible as bright as 16 mag in good condition in November and December, but not discovered. Now it is fading unusually rapidly. It was 16.8 mag on Jan. 22, but faded in a short time down to 18.0 mag on Feb. 4 (Giovanni Sostero).

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11   5 51.67   17  1.2   1.369   2.104   125   17.2  20:26 (  0, 72)  
Feb. 18   5 56.24   16 17.0   1.457   2.128   119   17.4  20:03 (  0, 71)  

* 119P/Parker-Hartley

It reached to 17 mag in 2004 autumn. Although it has been not observable for a while, now it is observable as 17 mag in good condition again. It was reported as 18 mag recently, fainter than this ephemeris by about 1 mag.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11   7 14.00   16 41.4   2.474   3.333   145   17.3  21:48 (  0, 72)  
Feb. 18   7 11.76   16 48.8   2.548   3.347   137   17.4  21:18 (  0, 72)  

* C/2005 R4 ( LINEAR )

Although it was so faint as 18.5 mag at the discovery in September, it brightened rapidly. It reached to 16.4 mag on Nov. 27 (Yuji Ohshima). It will be observable around 17 mag until March.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11   3  5.10   18 32.0   5.149   5.192    87   17.4  19:03 ( 54, 65)  
Feb. 18   3  2.31   18 32.7   5.282   5.190    79   17.4  19:09 ( 66, 59)  

* C/2005 G1 ( LINEAR )

It was observed as 17.6 mag on Jan. 3 (Ken-ichi Kadota). It will be observable at 18 mag in good condition until May.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  15  7.33   63 39.2   4.599   4.963   106   17.5   5:25 (184, 61)  
Feb. 18  14 57.65   65 31.6   4.572   4.961   107   17.5   5:07 (180, 60)  

* C/2004 Q1 ( Tucker )

It was 17.3 mag on Nov. 1 (Ken-ichi Kadota), fading slowly as expected. It will be fainter than 18 mag in March. It keeps locating high.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  13 24.64   38 38.9   4.371   4.998   124   17.7   4:02 (180, 86)  
Feb. 18  13 20.41   39 12.1   4.376   5.056   128   17.8   3:30 (180, 86)  

* 99P/Kowal 1

It is observable at 17.7 mag in 2006 spring. It is also observable at 17.5 mag in 2007 spring, but the altitude will be a bit lower.

Date(TT)  R.A. (2000) Decl.   Delta     r    Elong.  m1   Best Time(A, h)  
Feb. 11  11 35.63    6 31.6   4.004   4.884   150   17.8   2:13 (  0, 61)  
Feb. 18  11 33.00    6 48.3   3.949   4.878   157   17.8   1:43 (  0, 62)  

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright(C) Seiichi Yoshida (comet@aerith.net). All rights reserved.